Re: Package Proposal: Payment_DTA, SOURCECODE

On 21 Aug 2003 at 13:56, Alan Knowles wrote: > I'd suggest you use an options array for > addExchange() and setAccountFileSender(), it means that your examples > will be self documenting.. > > - eg. I just copy/paste the example.. and pretty much dont need to > read the docs.... > > looks similar to our HSBC MRI data format.. - since I doubt anyone > else will ever use it.. - its not pearified :) > http://www.akbkhome.com:81/svn/hebehaven2/Payment/MRI.php Well Alan, this might again bring up the discussion what should be in pear and what not, right? *g* What is the MRI-format about? Some banking- internal or something? If it's worth to some people I guess it might also a good solution to suggest. Together with the IBAN-discussion I started *g* we've recently had someone from a bank here on the list. And maybe they would have need for "your" special Payment-package also. Since somebody outlined that PEAR is / should be an "enterprise- grade repository" maybe also enterprise-functions should find it's way in. Give it a thought and maybe pearify+offer. PS: It's quite small at the moment. But maybe you could extend functionality? Like also be able to read in a disc-datafile, do validation and things like that? Stefan