Re: Re: dependencies andapplications

On 21 Aug 2003 at 17:50, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:45:17 +0200 > "Stefan Neufeind" <stefan@neufeind.net> wrote: > > > Or what did you try to explain, Pierre? > > I remind you (if required) that we will not allow a package release > which does not respect the current rules. Not required. And I'm not talking about a specific package. But if it's the core-component, the installer, and we can agree on a solution (also the pear-group, for sure) then we might be able to extend the rules. We're not talking about breaking something. And as you stated corretly: The *current* rules. So maybe if we agree on something the pear-group we might change the rules accordingly and everything is fine again :-))) PS: If our solution with: MDB/MDB.php becoming pear/MDB/2.0/MDB.php is not acceptable with the rules and the rules can't be changed, from your point of view ... then what are we talking about. That's what I meant when I proposed that a first clearing summary for the ideas mentioned, written and distributed by pear-group, might be a good way to go. Stefan Stefan