Re: Package Proposal : Archive_Zip

Thanks Lukas for your quick answer ! What don't you like exactly in the PclZip API ? The use of variable parameters like arch->extract(PCLZIP_OPT_PATH, "folder", PCLZIP_OPT_REMOVE_ALL_PATH); ? If yes, how do you think is the best solution when you have lots of available way to extract (by name, by index, by reg-exp, ...), define a method per way ? a method per options (remove path, add path, ...) ? Use flags in the class object ? ... Thanks for any input. (BTW I'm not sure I like the idea to rewrite a lot of PclZip code ....) Regards, Vincent ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lukas Smith" <smith@backendmedia.com> To: "'Vincent Blavet'" <vincent@phpconcept.net>; <pear-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 11:33 PM Subject: RE: [PEAR-DEV] Package Proposal : Archive_Zip > > From: Vincent Blavet [mailto:vincent@phpconcept.net] > > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 11:22 PM > > > I do have a PHP class which is managing Zip archive. This class is > > available since feb 2002 with name PclZip from > > http://www.phpconcept.net/pclzip/index.en.php. > > I propose to have PclZip adapted to fit PEAR requirements and becomes > an > > Archive_Zip package. > > > > Do you think it can help ? > > > > I also see that the zip feature from PHP is now available as a PECL > > Package, do you think that there is a place for Archive_Zip ? I think > yes > > because PclZip seems to offer much features. > > > > Thanks for your feedbacks, > > Yeah the zip ext for php is kinda limited as it supports read only and > it is also not enabled by default. > > I must admit I don't like the API in the pclzip package, but if you can > model the package as similar as possible to the Archive_Tar package I > would be a happy camper. > > Regards, > Lukas > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >