Re: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] DTD-0.3 (alpha) Released.

On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 19:02:04 +0200 "Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com> wrote: > Well, XML_DTD sounds the best, but I choosed just DTD to easy the > class naming: XML_DTD_Parser, XML_DTD_Tree, XML_DTD_XmlValidator, > the target installed paths: XML/DTD/ and the long file names. Lazyness is not allowed around ;-). > > Did I miss something or has there > > been no voting on the package? > > There was no voting yes. I primary started this package as an addon > for the main PEAR package, of course makes a lot more of sense to have > this as a separate package than including this directly into the main > PEAR package, don't you find it so? > > Please tell me guys if you have any inconvenience with this package. > I'm sorry didn't want to bypass our burocracy :-). Go ahead, it's a kind of subpackage and yes it's more usefull as a separate package, even if PEAR apis will require it. This is not a bypass from Tomas. This package is required by the API. Providing it as a separate package adds more flexibility to anyone who would like to use it. pierre