Re: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] DTD-0.3 (alpha) Released.

On 7 Sep 2003 at 19:58, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 19:02:04 +0200 > "Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com> wrote: > > > Well, XML_DTD sounds the best, but I choosed just DTD to easy the > > class naming: XML_DTD_Parser, XML_DTD_Tree, XML_DTD_XmlValidator, > > the target installed paths: XML/DTD/ and the long file names. > > Lazyness is not allowed around ;-). Same here. Would prefer XML_DTD as well ... > > > Did I miss something or has there > > > been no voting on the package? > > > > There was no voting yes. I primary started this package as an addon > > for the main PEAR package, of course makes a lot more of sense to > > have this as a separate package than including this directly into > > the main PEAR package, don't you find it so? > > > > Please tell me guys if you have any inconvenience with this package. > > I'm sorry didn't want to bypass our burocracy :-). > > Go ahead, it's a kind of subpackage and yes it's more usefull as a > separate package, even if PEAR apis will require it. > > This is not a bypass from Tomas. This package is required by > the API. Providing it as a separate package adds more flexibility to > anyone who would like to use it. Okay, but refering to the naming etc. he *could* at least have written a small mail on pear-dev or at least write a message "what I will do" so people could complain 24 hours before release :-) It's not a grave problem I see - but as stated by some others it seemed/seems not justified to start things like that without prior announcement (sticking to the rules) or at least some announcement / discussion (my prefered "practical" solution in this special situation). Anyway, Tomas: Thank you for the package :-))) Stefan