AW: AW: [PEAR-DEV] [Call for Votes] HTTP_Download

From: Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 09:30:47 +0000
Subject: AW: AW: [PEAR-DEV] [Call for Votes] HTTP_Download
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-22303@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, > Well I don't think that pointers *instead* of a filename is best, > but it will probably be implemented if you would explicate a few > reasons for that. ATM it would make the class much more > complicated and lapse Range support. First off, of course I meant that both ways should be possible. Now for a simple example. Let's say you are dynamically creating a the downloadable file, you most probably have a filepointer to which the data is written. Then you close the filepointer and hand over the filename. HTTP_Download is now opening the file again. So why not just rewind($fp) and hand this over to HTTP_Download. Stephan

« previous php.pear.dev (#22303) next »