Re: [PEPr] Call for test on new proposal system

<zitiere wer="Arnaud Limbourg"> > Hi, Hi Arnaud! > great news ! here are my remarks > New package proposal > Package describtion should be description ;) Ooooops... > The package dependencies (list). Instead of a textarea could it show a > checkboxes list of all the packages since they are in the database, > right ? Having a textarea is just asking for typos. > Seeing that they can also be external libs, it hink there should be two > lists. One as pear packages dependencies where you check the packages, > and a free textarea for anything else. Does that make sense ? I think, these solutions are a bit ugly. If we but on checkboxes listing the packages, there will be a list of up to 250 checkboxes. A bit much I think. IMHO the textarea only solution is fine, because it's free to enter comments (as I did with Net_SMS). Typos do not matter in this case, because the dependency list is not processed anywhere and only printed out on the website. Regards, Toby -- <?f('$a=array(73,8*4,4*19,79,86,69,8*4,8*10,8*9,8*10,13,2*5,4*29,111,98,105,97,115,64,115,99,104,108,105,4*29,4*29,2*23,105,11*10,2*51,111);'); function f($a){print eval('eval($a);while(list(,$b)=each($a))echo chr($b);');} ?>