Re: [PEPr] Call for test on new proposal system
| From: | Tobias Schlitt | Date: | Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:34:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Call for test on new proposal system | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-24019@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 20:11, Greg Militello wrote:
> Hi Toby!
Hi Greg!
> >I think you got something wrong. We are talking about package proposals.
> >For a proposal there is no need for package.xml and it is not available.
> Well isn't that a bummer? Seeing as I've never submitted anything to
> PEAR, that's probably why I didn't catch that.
No problem! I hopefully will bring up a tutorial how to use PEPr in the
next days.
> Can you post a flow? Perhaps the existing PEAR project proposal flow,
> as well as what your system will change? It might give a guy like me a
> better understanding, and it would be a lot easier to make process
> suggestions.
You can find the definition of the PEAR group here:
http://pear.php.net/group/docs/20030904-pph.php
A little graphic of the process I uploaded here:
http://www.schlitt.info/RFCs/proposal_process.gif
> Perhaps the package.xml isn't included in the proposal now, but what if
> your change(s) included that? I don't want to tread in rough water
> here, but it seems to me that people don't like double work. Maybe
> there is a way to stream line this?
> I've spent a lot of time refining business processes, and this is one
> area I see pop-up a lot...
I do not think, this is very usefull. Normaly package proposals start
with a recommended category and package name, which often changes during
the proposal process. Building a whole package.xml (what can be a real
pain) is out of all proportion to entering 2 input fields on a website.
> >By the way, http://preview.pear.php.net/ takes you to the
> >preview site
> >(and allways did), since the preview site is a 1:1 copy of pear.php.net,
> >except it contains PEPr, since you can see a link "Browse Proposals" on
> >the main site and if you even logged into that site (using your normal
> >pearweb account) you can create a "New Proposal" from there.
> By the way, I am a little slow on the draw sometimes. :) Next time, I
> really do have to read your email completely, and not gleam off the top.
> After actually paying attention to what you said this time (my bad) I
> found the PEPr review stuff. If I see anything I would like changed,
> I'll be sure to email you.
No problem.
a passion for php http://www.schlitt.info