Re: [PEPr] Call for test on new proposal system

Hi Greg! On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 18:20, Greg Militello wrote: > >> What about using a multiple select? > >> <select name="dependencies" size="5" > >> multiple="multiple"> > >Sorry, Davey, but I really think that's bogus. What do you need correct > >typing of package names for? > I contend this doesn't even need to be collected, as it already exists in the package.xml > file. > XPATH to the dependencies: > /package/release/deps/dep > > Couldn't this simply be parsed out and then displayed? > Why keep data in multiple places? > Plus if it is collected from the package.xml file, it could introduce an other check for the > package. > Unless I missed something in the process, if I did, feel free to correct me. :) I think you got something wrong. We are talking about package proposals. For a proposal there is no need for package.xml and it is not available. > By the way, http://preview.pear.php.net/ takes me to PEAR, not > to the preview. By the way, http://preview.pear.php.net/ takes you to the preview site (and allways did), since the preview site is a 1:1 copy of pear.php.net, except it contains PEPr, since you can see a link "Browse Proposals" on the main site and if you even logged into that site (using your normal pearweb account) you can create a "New Proposal" from there. > When preview comes back online, I'll be sure to check it out. It was. All the time. > -Greg M. Regards, Toby a good computer is like a tipi - no windows, no gates and an apache inside http://www.schlitt.info %