Re: About proposal Networking::Net_IMInfo

In this particualar case it was difficult to give it a +1 conditional, as my -1 reasoning was that the code wasnt even viewable, so it could not be reviewed properly.. before getting a +1 conditional. It does sound like we need a way to comment only, even after it has gone to voting.. (and the ability to edit the proposal during voting..) Regards Alan Stefan Neufeind wrote:

Hi, it seems to me that there were different people heading in the same direction but with different votes. E.g. I for myself put a +1 with a condition to make the package more flexible (thinking of driver-based etc.) and widen it's functionality. Others like Martin and Stephan S. thought mostly / exactly the same way, but gave a -1 for this with a "I will change this to +1 if ..."-condition. Shouldn't this have been a +1 conditional? Anyways, imho it might be a good idea for Andrew to speak up about the requested changes, if he intends to change the functionality of the package or not. Then maybe it might be a good idea to restart the voting-process as soon as that is cleared. PS: Maybe it's just me who's feeling this way - but that voting is imho somehow running in a crazy way ... Stefan