Re: About proposal Networking::Net_IMInfo

Wednesday, April 21, 2004 7:58 AM Andrew Heebner andrew@evilwalrus.com wrote: > There seems to be a very thin line between constructive criticism, and > making the user rewrite his/her entire code to suit the 'specs' of PEAR. > > I feel PEAR needs to loosen it's grip on the noose that the PEAR dev's wrap > around everyone's neck, and allow the user to write the code the way *they* > want to write it, of course, in conformity with the PEAR coding practices. > After all, it *is* the maintainer's job to update the package when needed, > so I don't see the big deal behind not allowing a package in, or voting -1, > just because we didn't do what you told us. > > In all, I feel PEAR needs to loosen up, and allow the user to decide what > *they* want the end user to be able to use, not what the PEAR dev's want. > Other people use PEAR too, not just PEAR devs. > > Just my $0.02. > > ~ Andrew Heebner May you look and see, what are PEAR developers said about PEAR?? http://wiki.ciaweb.net/yawiki/index.php?wiki=PEAR_Dev&page=PearGreatness Regards, Firman