Re: Re: cvs: pear /Math_Numbers package.xml

On Apr 29, 2004, at 12:06 AM, Daniel Convissor wrote:

On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 11:59:00PM +0200, Klaus Guenther wrote:

I really disagree with the "release notes only for a given release" business. If I release a series of betas before going stable, should the stable release mention the changes? Absolutely!

You do realize that the <notes> for each release automatically wind up in the changelog on the web site? http://pear.php.net/package-changelog.php?package=Numbers_Roman

yes I am aware of that and is perfectly accurate. Both source codes implement the described functions. The only alternative was adding as note something like " fixed version number" which doesn't look very attractive to me.

So, if you include prior changes in the <notes> section, the changelog will contain duplcate information. Why, go take a look at the URI above and see what I mean. 1.0.1 and 0.2.0 contain the same exact info. this is accurate.

Also, I just noticed that the new version without putting the beta state in the version number.

I did it exactly in the same way done on XML_Serializer, Liveuser, Games_Chess, Text Wiki just to name a few. and I did asked on IRC before the commit, so if there is any problem, it was not caused by me or my package. If my version naming is wrong, I would appreciate if someone would point out the other package leads (see some of the above mentioned examples) to change their Package.xml and of course roll another release. Cheers David Costa