Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::ProtectedMembers
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:07:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::ProtectedMembers | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-31275@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Markus Wolff wrote:
Of course, it's not just the underscore which is the reason for a (very easy to adjust to) API break - the main reason is inconsistency in the naming of the properties: Some of them are in we_divide_words_with_underscores style and some of them use studlyCapsStyle, which is because originally I followed the style DB_DataObject had in its .ini file and when the package got accepted into PEAR, I started using studlyCaps to follow CS... now, before 1.0 comes out, it's time to clean up this mess before it's too late.Actually I am not sure we even have a CS for properties naming beyond the "_" prefix. regards, Lukas Smith smith@backendmedia.com _______________________________ BackendMedia www.backendmedia.com berlin@backendmedia.com Linn Zwoch Smith GbR Pariser Str. 44 D-10707 Berlin Tel +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax +49 30 83 22 50 07