Re: Requiring SCM

Richard York wrote:

It is too time consuming. I can't speak for others, but I currently maintain all of my docs, etc, off-site, so far it's worked quite well. This last point may be moot and simply a show of my naivety of the process, but I also don't want others touching my code. I don't want any patches applied that I haven't personally investigated thoroughly. A little pedantic, but that's just me. At any rate, I like the idea of being able to see the source code, just give us more than one way of doing it! :-)

Setting up a cvs server that requires ssh access is a piece of cake and would eliminate the problem of others committing changes. However, others could also provide patches against cvs for any problems. Get out of the stone age, man, or at least out of the cold war! :) Greg