Re: Requiring SCM

On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 12:06 -0500, Philippe Jausions wrote: > Daniel Convissor wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > > >>PEAR packages must have a public CVS, I tend to want it in the > >>cvs.php.net/pear repository but cannot be a requirement. > > > > > > I agree, though don't feel too bad about requiring cvs.php.net. > > > > --Dan > > IMHO it's bad if we only make people use cvs.php.net, because I don't want to force say Horde packages to have part of their packages on cvs.php.net and the rest on cvs.horde.org, that would just be inconvenient for them :) Which is btw. one of my main parts in choosing that I like to allow outside repos also, just so we all have the clear ;) > Here's something nobody has addressed: who will manage karma for the CVS > accounts? I took me months to get proper karma to two packages I help > on, and that's only because Lukas took the time to find a member of the > PHP group. Well we figure something out. > Otherwise, I think it makes sense to require cvs.php.net. I came across > a couple of packages lately that supposedly had their documentation on > an "external" web site. But all I found was either a 404 error, the site > structure changed or the doc was simply removed... We are not talking about that people have to put that in CVS ;-) Hehe, so this won't help things like getting rid of possible 404 errors. - Helgi