Re: Re: package.xml 2.0 dilemma
| From: | Alan Knowles | Date: | Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:56:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: package.xml 2.0 dilemma | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev php.pear.core |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-37932@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> To be blunt: you probably need to research more fully the features of
> PEAR 1.4.0, and it would be good to do this before requesting code
> changes. We've had the support of both a package.xml and package.xml
> 2.0 for *months* - as in PEAR 1.4.0a1 - hence package-PEAR.xml and
> package2.xml in every single commit for the PEAR package. Otherwise,
> nobody would be able to upgrade to any of the PEAR alphas.
I presumed that writing a package2.xml would remove the need to write a
package.xml, that was my suprise when I tried downloading svn with an
old pear install, and it failed..
either my memory is going, or I probably missed that discussion on
whether we where going to have to keep 2 package files uptodate.
Regards
Alan
>
> Greg
>