Re: package.xml 2.0 dilemma

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:44:35PM -0400, Greg Beaver wrote: > Then we can have more flexible tag ordering in package.xml. > > The problem with this is that suddenly, older package.xml 2.0-based > releases will become invalid. Pardon my delay in replying... Having a consistent tag ordering makes things easier to read. Allowing random ordering will create BC issues and a lot more work on your part. The answer is clear: leave things as they are. --Dan -- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y data intensive web and database programming http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409