Re: PEPr Automated Verification Process - firstenhancements

On 6/20/2005 8:09 PM, Lukas Smith spake the following words: > Michael Wallner wrote: > >> Arnaud Limbourg and someone else wrote: >> >>>> I always wonder if we should allow comments on draft proposals - it >>>> would save alot of time for the proposers trying to come up with a >>>> proposal that may never be accepted... >>> >>> +1 >> >> +1 > > Err? > > The point of the draft stage is it to privately assemble his draft and > to entire in all the data. The proposal stage is there for discussions. It seems that too many proposals get lost in draft status. Or stay there too long. I think there could/should be the possibility of discussion regarding the merits of the package itself. Something like the initial discussion that used to take place on pear-dev. It seems (and here I may be a bit out of touch) that some people first make a draft before talking about the whole concept on pear-dev. Being able to comment *before* code is written should be really helpful. +1 from me, too. Klaus