Re: [PEPr] Comment on HTML::AJAX

Klaus Guenther wrote:

On 7/22/2005 7:22 PM, Joshua Eichorn spake the following words:

Klaus Guenther wrote:

Klaus Guenther (http://pear.php.net/user/thesaur) has commented on the proposal for HTML::AJAX. Comment: Shouldn't the title of the proposal be HTML_Ajax, not just AJAX? HTML is the category, but it needs to be followed by the proposed class name (just a nitpick :) Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=276

Ajax is Soap AJAX is an acronym. I don't care all that much in the end but thats my reason. -josh

That's fine - I don't care if it's HTML_AJAX (which sounds like what you want it to be) or HTML_Ajax (which wouldn't recognize it as an acronym and probably wouldn't be a good thing). But it can't just be a proposal for AJAX, which would then claim top-level namespace :) I know in the body of the proposal it's properly called HTML_AJAX, but would be nice if that would be in the title, too :) Klaus Maybe im missing understanding the pepr interface, I put HTML in as the category name. When you browse things they show up as HTML :: AJAX if I put the name in as HTML_AJAX its going to show up as HTML : : HTML_AJAX which is kinda odd, other packages seems to be a mix of repeating the category or not. What the prefered way in pepr, and maybe the form should have an example of this.

-josh -josh