Re: [PEPr] Comment on HTML::AJAX

On 7/22/2005 7:31 PM, Joshua Eichorn spake the following words: > Klaus Guenther wrote: > >> That's fine - I don't care if it's HTML_AJAX (which sounds like what you >> want it to be) or HTML_Ajax (which wouldn't recognize it as an acronym >> and probably wouldn't be a good thing). But it can't just be a proposal >> for AJAX, which would then claim top-level namespace :) I know in the >> body of the proposal it's properly called HTML_AJAX, but would be nice >> if that would be in the title, too :) > > Maybe im missing understanding the pepr interface, I put HTML in as > the category name. When you browse things they show up as HTML :: > AJAX if I put the name in as HTML_AJAX its going to show up as HTML : > : HTML_AJAX which is kinda odd, other packages seems to be a mix of > repeating the category or not. What the prefered way in pepr, and > maybe the form should have an example of this. > -josh It should be HTML::HTML_AJAX, because HTML is the PEAR category, not part of the class name. We probably should make an example :) If you look at the proposals for the Images category, for example, you will see that the full package name is used after the category. Klaus