Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Requiring E_STRICT Compatibility for NewPEAR Packages
| From: | Alexey Borzov | Date: | Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:04:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Requiring E_STRICT Compatibility for NewPEAR Packages | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43333@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
Lukas Smith wrote:
Well, the point of this RFC is encouraging development for PHP5. Thus if we do get an E_STRICT compatible version of a package then I don't really care if we also get a PHP4 version (that version should probably be a separate proposal that should start only after the PHP5 version is accepted). Also it's a bit more fair than your +15 requirement, since that way few developers actually interested in getting the PHP4 version may cause the acceptance of the proposal. Getting +15 is almost impossible.Not sure if that is really a good idea. The 2 versions still need to be maintained. Beyond the interest of the given developer. Anyways if we allow PHP4 packages upto a given point, there is nothing from stopping them proposing a PHP4 variant of their package upto that point.The RFC should state that new packages must provide a PHP5 E_STRICT version, but not restrict to that version only.I sincerely doubt that people would write two versions of packages but if this ever happens... OK, I'll add this idea to the RFC.