[PEPr] Comment on RFC::Requiring E_STRICT Compatibility for New PEAR Packages

Daniel Convissor (http://pear.php.net/user/danielc) has commented on the proposal for RFC::Requiring E_STRICT Compatibility for New PEAR Packages. Comment: Regarding instanceof, can the wording be changed from "should be used instead of" to "is preferred to"? This is mainly because of autoload situations, let alone is_a() has been un-deprecated. Regarding E_STRICT dependencies, it seems best if encourage them rather force them. Perhaps we should leave room for the collective to decide whether the package is too important and/or the dependencies too vast. We might want to wait on finalizing this RFC because PHP is close to making some decisions regarding what E_STRICT is. Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=419 -- Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net