Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Requiring E_STRICT Compatibility for NewPEAR Packages

From: Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:57:20 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Requiring E_STRICT Compatibility for NewPEAR Packages
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-43356@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 7/10/06, Lukas Smith <lsmith@php.net> wrote:
Markus Tacker wrote: On a side note: I think this proposal could be extended or accomplished by another proposal to force the prefixing of all new or updated packages with "PEAR_" thus preventing a future collision with PHP classes. I agree. Care to write it up?
What's about only P_ I rather prefer prefix all by P_ or something shorter than PEAR (some pacakge names are aleaday way too long...) :) --Pierre

« previous php.pear.dev (#43356) next »