Re: priorities for PEAR project as a whole

the idea of pear 2.0 has been roughly rejected about 6 months ago..i might still have a url for it which ill check when i get on a computer (on phone now) im all for pear 2.0 for a marketing and general revemp anyway i see that we defenatly decided to go forward with pear and i lie this movement On 9/27/06, Bertrand Mansion <bmansion@mamasam.com> wrote:

Greg Beaver wrote: Hello all, I want to re-iterate the priorities for PEAR as a project that I brought up last spring, and see if we might be able to pull a few of you off of other projects for a short while to expedite this process. Summary: #1: make the PEAR website PEAR-installable, instead of syncing from CVS #2: add package groups for the website and for installer REST #3: any other changes, political or technical I agree the pear site could be improved etc., but this doesn't seem a priority to me, neither the REST stuff. I would deal with political and technical stuff first, now that we have some space, and see how the site could be adapted to what will be decided. It will be easier then not to go in a wrong direction with the, let's call it this way, PEAR web 2.0. -- Bertrand Mansion Mamasam Tel : +33 1 48 89 88 26 http://www.mamasam.com Creative Internet Solutions -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

-- David Coallier, Founder & Software Architect, Agora Production (http://agoraproduction.com) 51.42.06.70.18