Re: priorities for PEAR project as a whole
| From: | Lukas Kahwe Smith | Date: | Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:53:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: priorities for PEAR project as a whole | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-44215@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Dan Scott wrote:
I think the PEAR documentation aspect of the article might have been a bit optimistic, as I find that the documentation is by far the weakest part of PEAR -- especially when compared to sister project PECL. Many packages do not provide any user documentation. Some packages simply provide a link to a web site as their user documentation. Sometimes the referred-to site no longer exists.Especially since the promise if a wiki, users comments and livedocs have not yet really materialized. As for I18N, I think we have enough work on our hands with English documentation and imho out of date docs are worse than no docs. In terms of error messages. What I have done in MDB2 was to make it possible to overwrite the static error code to error message array mapping. Have a look at MDB2::errorMessage(). regards, Lukas