Re: priorities for PEAR project as a whole

davidc@php.net wrote: > the idea of pear 2.0 has been roughly rejected about 6 months ago..i > might still have a url for it which ill check when i get on a computer > (on phone now) im all for pear 2.0 for a marketing and general revemp > anyway i see that we defenatly decided to go forward with pear and i > lie this movement Hi, FYI, PEAR 2.0 was never rejected, but there were serious political issues with its design and who would be responsible. I am happy to steer the PEAR 2.0 "committee" but I have to warn people: I won't tolerate a 2 year timetable, I expect results in a matter of months. In fact, the changes I suggested for pearweb, I expect to see by Nov. 1 - at the latest. In other words, the political stuff I think could wait 30 days for a decision. I don't want to squelch discussion, but I desperately need developers to get things rolling. PEAR has been a big slow behemoth long enough, it's time to start moving. Those of you who have seen the pace at which I developed PEAR 1.4.x know what I'm talking about - no foot dragging folks :). Thanks, Greg