Re: Re: priorities for PEAR project as a whole

Ian Warner wrote:

Im sorry but I look at that wiki and think what a dull and boring lot PEAR is. What I was stating is that PEAR needs an official forum / wiki, branded and more importantly actually used - there is nothing up there, yes I dont mind creating entries but will anybody read it and contribute to it - it needs someone in the PEAR group to make a mandate for this kind of thing, I wish I could but you "dont know me".

I think the first step is widely agreed: Come up with a game plan. And for that the wiki I opened is sufficient. Port of the final game plan could quite realistically include user comments, wiki etc. All it really takes is 4-5 people that put in 2-3 months of dedication to come up and push through necessary changes in the organization and do some spring clean on the website. Personally I will not be one of those 4-5 people, but I can always answer questions and provide guideance based on the experience I have with how PEAR evolved in the past 4-5 years. regards, Lukas