Re: Please update package.xml to version 2 by September 1st, 2008
| From: | Laurent Laville | Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:15:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Please update package.xml to version 2 by September 1st, 2008 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-50429@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Brett,
All packages should upgrade their package.xml to version two or place a second package2.xml file along their existing package.xml - and upload a new release.Is there exception for package that are superseced ? I'm myself maintainer of HTML_Progress / HTML_Progress2. HTML_Progress is still with package xml v1 since last version 1.2.5 (2005-11-01) I don't see any reason to release a new version only to add a package xml v2 for a package that were stopped in development, while there is a new version HTML_Progress2 that continue (on dev and support). Perharps for those guys who still continue to download (still today)[1] an oldest version.
If you would like to request that QA not update your package after September 1st 2008, please send a note to pear-qa.Does it means, I should send a request in such condition : I think I'm not alone in this situation Regards Laurent Laville [1] http://pear.php.net/package-stats.php?pid=235&cid=10