Re: Request to publish a package
| From: | till | Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:36:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Request to publish a package | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-51439@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Daniel O'Connor
<daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote:
> You want http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-edit.php
>
> Just a side note: a class name like 'String' is unlikely to sit well with
> many; because its so general and likely to have been created many times in
> many existing projects.
>
> Also, this kind of class is primarily just syntax sugar (not necessarily a
> bad thing), so you will cop a reasonable amount of heat for that.
>
I was gonna ask -- hooray for a unified API, but is this really necessary? =)
@Carter: In general, all new packages have to go through the proposal
process, which includes voting and feedback on your code/class.
Till