Re: Re: revision to the standard that would make me happy

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Christian Weiske<cweiske@cweiske.de> wrote: > Greg, > > >> >> So we don't lose any of the rigor, and gain flexibility.  Does this >> >> modified sales pitch change your mind? :) >> > >> > I believe above stands as my answer.  I'm happy to be swayed by a >> > majority of non-PEAR developers showing me how I'm wrong, though. >> >> ...and this is why regrettably I must say I can't support either the >> standard or its advocate, Travis, for re-election to PEAR Group. >> Someone making decisions for PEAR should be advocating *for* PEAR, not >> against it. > indeed. Err, guys?! Let's not overreact and turn this into a game of politics. PEAR is not an island. Yeah, hard to believe but PEAR co-exists with many, many other projects. The download figures we got are nice, but e.g. I bet phpclasses exceeds them by far. ;-) Aside from whatever the standard looks like, Travis is trying to come up with something that would be also adopted outside of PEAR. This does not mean that he is *against* something. Big picture. Till