Re: pear svntag - Tag naming

Hi, On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Christian Weiske<cweiske@cweiske.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > > We should use $package-$version as tag name in svn. This allows us to > host multiple packages in one package tree (i.e. package + subpackages, > or in the case of pearweb, multiple packages that are the in the same > module). > > > So for OpenDocument version 0.2.0, I created a tag in >> pear/packages/OpenDocument/tags/OpenDocument-0.2.0 I committed some hours ago the svn tag functionality to the pear installer and there I decided it was release-0.2.0 instead of the good old RELEASE_0_2_0 Now what I see wrong with your approach is that people know already it's OpenDocument so repeating it in the tags dir is a bit of a none sense, one could argue that it is "nicer" for svn:externals because you get the package name directly but then again you can define exactly the name an svn:externals goes into. A compromise would be do have it simply as 0.2.0 and skip $packagename- and release- I would be interested in hearing what other people think about this before a PEAR release is done. - Helgi