Re: pear svntag - Tag naming

David Jean Louis wrote: > Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson a écrit : >> >> A compromise would be do have it simply as 0.2.0 and skip >> $packagename- and release- >> >> I would be interested in hearing what other people think about this >> before a PEAR release is done. >> >> - Helgi >> > > I'd suggest: > > tags/releases/X.Y.Z > > Tags are not necessarily releases, granted, they are *most* the time but > I'd like to keep an option to tag the code for a non release. > > And with the release-X.Y.Z naming scheme we may end up with a mess of > names in the tags/ directory in that case. Hi, I agree with Christian, subpackages should be supported. I don't think pear svntag is really necessary since it's now a 1-liner. All we need is a well-documented standard. how about: either tags/releases/X.Y.Z or tags/releases/Pname/X.Y.Z for those rare packages with subpackages. Greg