Re: pear svntag - Tag naming

Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Greg Beaver<greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote: > >> David Jean Louis wrote: >> >>> Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson a écrit : >>> >>>> A compromise would be do have it simply as 0.2.0 and skip >>>> $packagename- and release- >>>> >>>> I would be interested in hearing what other people think about this >>>> before a PEAR release is done. >>>> >>>> - Helgi >>>> >>>> >>> I'd suggest: >>> >>> tags/releases/X.Y.Z >>> >>> Tags are not necessarily releases, granted, they are *most* the time but >>> I'd like to keep an option to tag the code for a non release. >>> >>> And with the release-X.Y.Z naming scheme we may end up with a mess of >>> names in the tags/ directory in that case. >>> >> Hi, >> >> I agree with Christian, subpackages should be supported. >> >> I don't think pear svntag is really necessary since it's now a 1-liner. >> All we need is a well-documented standard. >> > > Well, I have written it already - It's even more code than cvstag due > to the remove tag / slide tag features :) > > I dare you to do this by hand btw, given that it's not just a svn cp > trunk -> tags ;-) > You need to copy all files that are in the package.xml so it ends up > being more than a one liner, and this feature is essential for those > sub package guys. > wow - I didn't realize you were cp'ing individual files, I retract my last comment :). >> how about: >> either tags/releases/X.Y.Z or tags/releases/Pname/X.Y.Z for those rare >> packages with subpackages. >> > > Well I guess I could also check if it's a sub package and then use > pname, if it's not a sub package I'd put it directly in the releases. > Shouldn't be much hassle. Sounds good. How would you detect whether it's a subpackage? Greg