Re: pear svntag - Tag naming

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Greg Beaver<greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote: > David Jean Louis wrote: >> Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson a écrit : >>> >>> A compromise would be do have it simply as 0.2.0 and skip >>> $packagename- and release- >>> >>> I would be interested in hearing what other people think about this >>> before a PEAR release is done. >>> >>> - Helgi >>> >> >> I'd suggest: >> >> tags/releases/X.Y.Z >> >> Tags are not necessarily releases, granted, they are *most* the time but >> I'd like to keep an option to tag the code for a non release. >> >> And with the release-X.Y.Z naming scheme we may end up with a mess of >> names in the tags/ directory in that case. > > Hi, > > I agree with Christian, subpackages should be supported. > > I don't think pear svntag is really necessary since it's now a 1-liner. >  All we need is a well-documented standard. Well, I have written it already - It's even more code than cvstag due to the remove tag / slide tag features :) I dare you to do this by hand btw, given that it's not just a svn cp trunk -> tags ;-) You need to copy all files that are in the package.xml so it ends up being more than a one liner, and this feature is essential for those sub package guys. > how about: > either tags/releases/X.Y.Z or tags/releases/Pname/X.Y.Z for those rare > packages with subpackages. Well I guess I could also check if it's a sub package and then use pname, if it's not a sub package I'd put it directly in the releases. Shouldn't be much hassle. - Helgi