Re: pear svntag - Tag naming
| From: | Christian Weiske | Date: | Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:23:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: pear svntag - Tag naming | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-52511@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Helgi,
> > We should use $package-$version as tag name in svn. This allows us to
> > host multiple packages in one package tree (i.e. package + subpackages,
> > or in the case of pearweb, multiple packages that are the in the same
> > module).
> >
> >
> > So for OpenDocument version 0.2.0, I created a tag in
> >> pear/packages/OpenDocument/tags/OpenDocument-0.2.0
>
> I committed some hours ago the svn tag functionality to the pear
> installer and there I decided it was release-0.2.0 instead of the good
> old RELEASE_0_2_0
>
> Now what I see wrong with your approach is that people know already
> it's OpenDocument so repeating it in the tags dir is a bit of a none
> sense, one could argue that it is "nicer" for svn:externals because
> you get the package name directly but then again you can define
> exactly the name an svn:externals goes into.
>
> A compromise would be do have it simply as 0.2.0 and skip
> $packagename- and release-
How does your idea solve the "package + subpackage in one directory" problem?
--
Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Christian Weiske