Re: HTTP_Client
| From: | Dan Allen | Date: | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 21:53:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: HTTP_Client | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-5716@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> why reinvent the wheel?
Two reasons...one, mine follows a very well defined standard (the
mozilla detection package, and as such I can just update mine when
they update theirs) and second the code for phpsniff.sourceforge.net
is ugly, non-pearified and not well defined. Plus, I implemented
ideas from Horde, which for all intents and purposes are brilliant.
So how about Net_UserAgent and we can call it final? Hey people,
worse comes to worse we can always rename it/move it. It isn't like
we are trying to decide where to build a house? Thanks for all the
responses!
What do you say Stig, happy with Net_UserAgent for now?
Dan
--
"While they're pumping, you're soaking them"
-- Speed Loader TV Advert