RE: [PEAR-DEV] contributing / disapointed

(Martin) > Nominating _one_ contribution manager may become a bit of hassle > once PEAR becomes bigger. (Imagine you would have to know > 200 > packages :). Of course, but about new packages ? Developpers (php-dev) would give advices. And after that, the contribution manager would give a clear answer. But you are right, inside a package, the 'leader' has to decide. But, in my opinion, it has to be clearly defined. Because if PEAR becomes bigger, there will be plenty of contributions ! :-) > (...) part of the website (...) It would be perfect. In case of contributions to existing packages, the form could work as a tracking system. The question would be send to the package developpers who would have to decide with radio buttons "Yes", "No", "You have to change things before"... and with an optional text field to explain... And the contributor could track the state of its code : "Not evaluated"... Fabien