RE: [PEAR-DEV] Virtual Filesystem

Quoting LIMBOURG Arnaud <arnaud.limbourg@cegetel.fr>: > > I was hoping we could avoid a fork, personally. > > > > > anyway - this is the roughtly API, I got so far, although I'm still > > > working through the issues with it.. > > > > Again, I'd love to get patches, and anyone who wants to work on this > > consistently should get a Horde CVS account... > > imho, it would not be good to duplicate VFS. > > Arnaud. > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php I know that forking wouldn't be a great thing, since it means that there's then two VFSs floating around the place, but I'm not sure how the changes that have been requested - especially switching returning arrays with returning objects can be done on the Horde version, without breaking the rest of Horde. I'm willing to try to keep the APIs as similar as possible, so that switching in either direction isn't *to* painful for people, but my current thoughts are that a fork is the only way to do this. Although I'm not sure whether it would be a fork, or a completely different project, since the changes will be quite substantial. Jon