RE: [PEAR] PEAR Guide/Docs

Martin, I find your comments harsh and unneccessary. How is a new user expected to learn about different aspects, if fellows like you are throwing out comments like 'Don't comment without knowledge.' Ernest already apologized for his lack of knowledge. As well IMHO, a mailing list (pear-doc@lists.php.net) is quite different from a project (PEAR documentation project). They may be associated, but definitely not the same. So your comments were not only harsh and unneccesary, but also show your ignorance. If I am to continue to use this list, posts like this should be discouraged and reprimanded. Thanks. Peter Meth -----Original Message----- From: Martin Jansen [mailto:mj@php.net] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:12 AM To: Ernest E Vogelsinger Cc: pear-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PEAR] PEAR Guide/Docs On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 12:55, Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote: > Just started delving into PEAR yesterday (using PHP for some time > now), and have to totally agreee with you regarding the documentation > issue. Think of what makes M$ big in languages? The Docs are. MFC is > good but bloated stuff, and .NET is nothing else than reinventing SOAP > with words - but they DOCUMENT everything to an extent that's still to > be seen elsewhere. Please sit down, relax, and compare Microsoft with PEAR: Who is paid for writing documentation and who is not? > IMHO there should be a "PEAR documentation project", pear-doc@lists.php.net > (pardon me if this already exists - as I said I just > began looking at PEAR yesterday). Don't comment without knowledge. Thanks. EOD. - Martin -- PEAR General Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php