design of forum applications
| From: | ThE PhP_KiD | Date: | Fri, 16 May 2003 15:49:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | design of forum applications | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-general+get-5413@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Very good you explanation !
Thanks
mac
--
...ThE PhP_KiD.
-> PEAR is much more then an abstraction layer for a database, it
-> is an entire
-> frame work. You cannot just take a single class from PEAR and
-> use it as is,
-> you'll need other parts of PEAR as well. So, let's say we are
-> going to use
-> MDB for our database needs. Now, our code includes a number of
-> files that not
-> only do the database abstraction but also PEAR style error
-> handling, which is
-> something we may not be using for the rest of out app. PEAR
-> packages (this is
-> not a bad thing per say) include a wide range of support for various
-> databases, if our intended goal is to support MySQL, PostgreSQL
-> and Sqlite,
-> then support for oci8, fbsql, etc... is once again overhead.
->
-> I'd say that PEAR is a good starting point to help you layout a
-> frame work of
-> your application. Perhaps, even power you app for a few early
-> releases that
-> will help you quickly get the 'boring' parts of the your apps engine and
-> concentrate on more important things. However, once you've
-> finalized the core
-> of your own code and performance becomes an issue PEAR classes, in most
-> cases, are something you'd want to replace with some custom code.
->
-> I should point out this is not PEAR problem per say, any major
-> general purpose
-> class abstraction system will suffer from this regardless of the
-> language.
-> However, from the few packages I was genuinely interested in
-> PEAR most were
-> not written with performance in mind.
->
-> Ilia