Re: [Fwd: [PEAR-QA] A little rant]

Salut ! Arnaud Limbourg wrote:

Fortunately I did not write anything mean in that mail :) Anyway, one idea I will keep from Pierre is that this process can be optional. Some people won't need a "guide" or may wish to ask the community directly via pear-dev list.

btw, can a dev be h[er|is] own guide ;) ?

The document may seem long but it often is when explaining something that sounds simple.

Though I think that no rule should be made here, I agree with the princip , sure ... I even think that no package should be maintained by a lonely man. Some federation to existing pckg can be great too ! I'm proud to have brought pablo and vincent together on File_Archive for example: Instead of 2 packages with each 1 dev, we have 1 stronger package with 2 devs (in different tz, even better) Means here, the "tutor" should come from similar area. But again, no rule, please. à+ -- bertrand "toggg" Gugger