Re: [Fwd: [PEAR-QA] A little rant]

Hi bertrand Gugger! On 07/08/05 16:23 you wrote: >> Fortunately I did not write anything mean in that mail :) >> Anyway, one idea I will keep from Pierre is that this process can be >> optional. >> Some people won't need a "guide" or may wish to ask the community >> directly via >> pear-dev list. > btw, can a dev be h[er|is] own guide ;) ? That's what I obviously missed. People above pear.pepr karma (meaning everyone maintaining at least 1 package) will not need a guide. :) >> The document may seem long but it often is when explaining something >> that sounds >> simple. > Though I think that no rule should be made here, > I agree with the princip , sure ... > I even think that no package should be maintained by a lonely man. > Some federation to existing pckg can be great too ! > I'm proud to have brought pablo and vincent together on File_Archive for > example: > Instead of 2 packages with each 1 dev, > we have 1 stronger package with 2 devs (in different tz, even better) > Means here, the "tutor" should come from similar area. I think a tutor should be selected (in fact he volunteers) by his interesst. If someone is interessted in a package, he can guide the proposal. :) > But again, no rule, please. Please review my answers to the other posts. I'm of the strong opinion to make this mandatory. Regards, Toby -- Tobias Schlitt - Zend Certified Engineer GPG Key: 0xA6529579 a passion for php http://www.schlitt.info Like to say "thank you"? - http://pear.php.net/wishlist.php/toby