Re: [Fwd: [PEAR-QA] A little rant]
| From: | Matthew Fonda | Date: | Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:59:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [PEAR-QA] A little rant] | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2795@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 17:23:40 +0200 tobias@schlitt.info (Tobias Schlitt) wrote:Regrads, Matthew FondaHi Lukas Smith! On 07/08/05 16:10 you wrote:They obviously need a set of guides if we continue to add rules... I strongly oppose to that. A note on the pepr page should be enough: "Do not hesitate to ask for assistance on our developer lists or on irc" Regards, --Pierre I agree with Pierre, we have irc and lists, as well as a place to comment on proposals. They are there for this exact reason.I see your point, but I'm strongly for making this required for new proposers. People who actively maintain a package obviously need no guide for new proposals (they should be quite familiar with our community).Fortunately I did not write anything mean in that mail :)Yeah I think the idea of a guide should be made optional, yet visible. Proposers should be encouraged to find a guide and pear-dev people should be encouraged to offer guidance.Anyway, one idea I will keep from Pierre is that this process can be optional. Some people won't need a "guide" or may wish to ask the community directly via pear-dev list.