Re: [Fwd: [PEAR-QA] A little rant]
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:17:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [PEAR-QA] A little rant] | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2793@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 17:23:40 +0200
tobias@schlitt.info (Tobias Schlitt) wrote:
> Hi Lukas Smith!
> On 07/08/05 16:10 you wrote:
>
> >> Fortunately I did not write anything mean in that mail :)
>
> >> Anyway, one idea I will keep from Pierre is that this process
> >> can be optional.
> >> Some people won't need a "guide" or may wish to ask the
> >> community directly via
> >> pear-dev list.
>
> > Yeah I think the idea of a guide should be made optional, yet
> > visible. Proposers should be encouraged to find a guide and
> > pear-dev people should be encouraged to offer guidance.
>
> I see your point, but I'm strongly for making this required for
> new proposers. People who actively maintain a package obviously
> need no guide for new proposals (they should be quite familiar
> with our community).
They obviously need a set of guides if we continue to add rules...
I strongly oppose to that.
A note on the pepr page should be enough: "Do not hesitate to ask
for assistance on our developer lists or on irc"
Regards,
--Pierre