Re: [Fwd: [PEAR-QA] A little rant]
| From: | Philippe Jausions | Date: | Fri, 08 Jul 2005 20:23:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [PEAR-QA] A little rant] | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2796@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Tobias Schlitt wrote:
Maybe a self-assessment by the new proposer would be enough? 1. I've been programming with PHP for more than (X) years, 2. I use (no|little|a lot) of PEAR packages, 3. I regularly read the PEAR-DEV and/or PEAR-CORE mailing list, 4. I know what a coding standard is and I follow it. 5.... and then depending on the answers tell them that a guide is recommended, required, optional... My 2c, -PhilippeI think a tutor should be selected (in fact he volunteers) by his interesst. If someone is interessted in a package, he can guide the proposal. :) Please review my answers to the other posts. I'm of the strong opinion to make this mandatory.Anyway, one idea I will keep from Pierre is that this process can be optional. Some people won't need a "guide" or may wish to ask the community directly via pear-dev list.