Re: Re: cvs: pearweb /public_html/trackback trackback-admin.php

On 10/26/05, Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote: > > Helgi Þormar wrote: > >>As it stands now Chiara_PEAR_Server is not at all a good alternative. > > > > > > That would be right. > > > > > >>The package uses a customized database instead of the pearweb one. In > >>addition, it has no unit tests and requires PHP 5. When it is ready, it > >>can be aptly named PEAR_Server or PEAR_Channel_Server, or whatever, > >>obviously. > > > > > > Last time I saw it had like 5x backends, kinda mind buggling. > > A quick note: please do not post incorrect information unless you've > used the package - it has 1 backend, and has only ever had 1 backend. I > don't appreciate uninformed opinions unless they are marked as such. Which part of "like" did you not understand ? Is it a expression you don't use back in the US ? if I say "The man was like 6 feet tall" that would mean "That man was around 6 feet tall" ... i.e. I'm uncertain but I think I can guess near the right number ... About the backends, I saw mysql only one, db one and db_do one if I remember things correctly ... so what were all those doing in the code then ? Just hanging around having a bud ? When I look at it I see 3x backends, http://cvs.phpdoc.org/browse.php/PEAR_Server/Server/Backend/ ... one is pearweb specific (pear::db used there), mdb and DO, I guess the mysql only is a install only thing ... So why do you not appreciate uninformed opinions when you can't even give out informed facts ? Now I can venture a guess that you'll say "only one is maintained others are just legacy", then I want to state out front, I'm making my uninformed opinions from what I see from CVS and saw in the past when I spent quite a bit of time trying to install that thing. I think this whole thread and topic should just be dropped, this has gone into none sense and finger pointing and does not good, savvy? - Helgi