Re: [pear-webmaster] Re: [PEAR-CORE] Re: cvs: pearweb /public_html/trackback trackback-admin.php

On Sat Oct 22, 2005 at 06:4614AM +0000, Helgi Þormar wrote: > On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:46:52 -0400, Greg Beaver wrote: > > > Let me absolutely clear: there have been a large number of "fixing > > broken commit" commit messages over the past 2-3 months in pearweb. > > Might be, I haven't noticed it that much, maybe my memory is failing > me. Most likely. > as far as I know and I noticed when Pierre changed the register globals > off then he tried to fix as many issues as he could locate locally, so he > tried, he asked me to test also but I didn't have time nor did I have a > dev env up, tho I can't recall if he asked someone else or posted to the > ML, think Martin was even online at the same time. I don't know how you define being online, but if you define it as "having joined #pear", then this is a bogus argument: Most of the time I don't pay any attention to IRC even when I'm logged in. > > If it is too much to ask that we test code before committing, then I > > suggest we take a SERIOUS look at our priorities. > > Nobody said people should commit with out testing, I'm just saying having > a policy about this is nothing but stupid and drives people away. May I point you to the second clause of pearweb/README then? I suggest panic. - Martin