Re: Comment on Doc - function/method names

From: Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 15:55:05 +0000
Subject: Re: Comment on Doc - function/method names
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear 
Request: Send a blank email to php-pear+get-57@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
"Stig S. Bakken" wrote: > > Ulf Wendel wrote: > > I like the idea that methodnames must not contain underscores. I > > do not like the idea that (user-) functions should be named with > > underscores. These names should be reserved for php functions. > > Not much left for user functions then? :-) Maybe we should just drop > the function naming convention completely. I don't think so. All I want is to shift the distinction beetween user functions (underscore) and user methods (no underscore) to user side (no underscore) and php side stuff (underscore). > > How about taking the java coding conventions but modify > > (simplify) it for the needs of php? > > Is it written out full somewhere? URL? I forgot... http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/index.html, with special focus on http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConventions.doc8.html#367 Ulf -- Ulf Wendel NetUSE Kommunikationstechnologie GmbH Siemenswall, D-24107 Kiel, Germany Fon: +49 431 386435 00 -- Fax: +49 431 386435 99

« previous php.pear (#57) next »