Re: Comment on Doc - function/method names
| From: | chagenbu at wso dot williams dot edu | Date: | Wed, 01 Mar 2000 21:27:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Comment on Doc - function/method names | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-pear+get-63@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Quoting "Stig S. Bakken" <ssb@fast.no>:
> Not much left for user functions then? :-) Maybe we should just drop
> the function naming convention completely.
I don't think that's a good idea. Conventions are useful, even if they get
broken; if the majority of PEAR packages follow a convention, it'll be worth it
to have one.
So I'd say choose the convention that seems to fit best what people want, and if
not everyone follows it, oh well.
-chuck