Re: HTTP Class
| From: | Chuck Hagenbuch | Date: | Sat, 06 Jan 2001 02:17:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: HTTP Class | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-pear+get-806@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Quoting Manuel Lemos <mlemos@acm.org>:
> >Please don't use this site as the only reference for publically
>
> If you read the original message again you can see that I said "Uploading
> classes to this site would never stop you from uploading anywhere else you
> want".
And if you read his sentence, you would see that he was simply encouraging
people to do just that and upload elsewhere. He didn't say "don't put your code
on phpclasses".
This is an old, old argument, for those of you who have missed the history (I
don't have all of it).
> In PEAR repository it is assumed that there is only one way to do
> something right. In PEAR repository there seems to be only space for one
> class of each type. This leaves absolutely no space for others to come
> with different approaches to do the same.
This is not true. PEAR (and I'm going to give my own vision of PEAR here; you
are all free to dispute it) simply aims to have things well organized, well
documented, and well thought out. If there are two (or even three) well-thought
out, honestly different ways to do something, well, then PEAR has room for all
three. If there are 4 different implementations of one idea, then PEAR will
create a best-of-breed implementation of that idea out of all 4.
> So, please be serious when you bother to criticize the work of others that
> effectively contribute for the joy of being part of the PHP community.
> You may not realize just yet who you are hitting, but some day you will.
Sincerely,
Chuck